|
||
|
|||
|
SHOOT TO KILL
there are 2 sides to shooting, the consciences can get no bigger, but when you have anaRCHY resting on a trigger, i think its time the ones hit are the ones looting. dont get me wrong, i am with the ones being done over, because Westminster is driving a 4 wheel rover, clearly saying the less well off dont belong. there will be Case's of death, in which the police will act corrupt, from the past we must remember when it did abrupt, Mark Dougan for sure is to take your breath. but i will not be swayed, even if there are coppers that are shrewd, because our justice system will deal with and not exclude, and hardened criminals should never have shade. if you have a gun or impersonate, then your voice is now hidden, if you are rioting or doing anything forbidden, sorry but the police have my permission to assassinate. ( I DO FEEL SO THAT RIOTS DONT EVER HAPPEN AGAIN THE SMALL MINORITY THAT CAUSE TROUBLE SHOULD FEEL THE FALSE OF THE LAW AND IF THEY CHOOSE TO DO CRIMINAL THINGS THEY THEY HAVE TAKEN THERE CHOICE IN MAYBE BEING HURT OR SHOT AT - ITS QUITE SIMPLE I THINK - STICK TO THE LAW AND YOU WILL AVOID TROUBLE - AND AS FOR THE POLICE THAT ABUSE THERE LAWS - THEN THEY ARE DEALT WITH ACCORDINGILY.) |
| Sponsored Links |
|
|||
|
[QUOTE=tommysize1;69138]i feel the riots could of been a good thing.
it should of just targeted banks/stock market and the like. not argos or the local cornershop. it would of got more media attention than the st.pauls campsite thing (which is non-existent on most people's consciousness) *why did the riots happen? any historians reading who can shed some light on any similar occasions?[/QUOTE] i agree tommy - so much better would it have been if they only targetted the ones that caused all this mess and the point word have been backed by the nation i think. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|