views on if the govenment should cap benefits ?

[JoeCrash]

cap benefits

who was it under that "right to buy" was introduced,
were all the gold property's snapped up and counsel stocks reduced.
did the byers take a risk or gamble,
or did the low paid, get the right to hand ball.
as you can see the shortage is mega,
but for the ones that bought, got out of being a beggar.
with up to 70% off it was a grab a snatch a deal,
we are all now paying for it,and its real.
every government has stopped building,
but the amount of space leaves us fielding.
you can not have areas that discriminate,
because under current laws, your legal bill will ac***ulate.
if rent costs the government, then they should provide,
but if you cap benefits to areas, bigger will be the social divide.
no-one should be claiming more then a well paid job,
but governments should not be forcing *****ry, as that to is a rob.


i think the uk is going to be split up soon lol the rich in one part and the poor in the other - its just not right - anyone got views on if this will happen or is it already here ?

[sukisue]

benifits should be earned if you have been on them for more than 2 yrs by doing voluntary work were it is needed

[JoeCrash]

thats tricky one - because then the govenment will start abuseing that and getting there streets cleaned and all other horrible job done for free and they would still take our tax and no doubt give themselves a bigger bonus.


so i disagree - it is no easy life living of £65 job seekers allowance and they have a rough ride .